WHEN DOES THE PANDEMIC RESPONSE HURT FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS? VIOLATING THE RULES OF THE GAME
Main Article Content
Abstract
This essay aims to analyze the conflict between the provision of public security in times of a pandemic and the interest of individual freedom, in addition to the legislative implications in the field of fundamental norms, their problems and meanings. The method is hypothetical-deductive for data collection, and bibliographic and documentary analysis. The objective is to prove the hypothesis that there is legitimacy in the state recommendations in terms of proposing isolation during the pandemic, even though it is not always legal. It is concluded in order to attribute to the current state of affairs of the pandemic the factor capable of providing mobilization on the part of states and municipalities.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c). Conjuncture Bulletin (BOCA)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília: Planalto, 1988. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 28/03/2021.
BRASIL. "Decisão do STF sobre isolamento social". Portal Eletrônico do Senado [16/04/2020]. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 15/07/2020.
BRASIL. Decreto-lei n° 13.979, de 6 de fevereiro de 2020. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 28/03/2021.
FERRAJOLI, L. Por uma teoria dos direitos e dos bens fundamentais. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2011.
FONTANA FILHO, M. “Coronóptico digital: o Estado de exceção se tornará permanente?”. Boletim de Conjuntura (BOCA), vol. 4, n. 12, 2020.
NOVELINO, M. Curso de Direito Constitucional. São Paulo: Editora Juspodivm, 2020.
SENHORAS, E. M. “Coronavírus e o papel das pandemias na história humana”. Boletim de Conjuntura (BOCA), vol. 1, n. 1, 2020.
WHO - World Health Organization. “WHO coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard” WHO Website [26/02/2021]. Disponível em: <https://covid19.who.int>. Acesso em: 26/02/2021.