GOVERNANCE AND PERCEPTIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE: A STUDY OF SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION

Contenido principal del artículo

Ismael Martins da Silva
Ricardo Guimarães de Queiroz
Régio Marcio Toesca Gimenes

Resumen

The governance model established in an organization is directly related to the type of transactions it carries out. These transactions are marked by transaction costs, inherent to behavioral assumptions (opportunistic behavior and limited rationality) and other transaction factors (asset specificity, frequency, and uncertainty). The relationship between partners should be beneficial when there is a perception of fairness, especially at the initial stage of the relationship, when those involved are not yet completely familiar with the other partners' working methodologies. In this sense, the perception of fairness in the relationship improves and the predisposition to business should increase. Therefore, this study aimed to review scientific works in the international literature and how they dimension the impact of perceptions of organizational justice and relations between agents and the governance of organizations. The pattern of publications worldwide highlights the participation of developed countries in North America and Europe in the subject study, such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Denmark, for example. This research identified the characteristics of the agents that guide the relationships linked to the main theme of this paper, such as commitment, trust, insecurity, cooperation, and positive and negative feelings, for example. According to the authors, organizational justice has a positive impact on the relational governance performance of rural cooperatives. Likewise, they state that improving the level of governance is directly linked to the positive participation of members in the institution's internal governance.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
SILVA, I. M. da; QUEIROZ, R. G. de .; GIMENES, R. M. T. . GOVERNANCE AND PERCEPTIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE: A STUDY OF SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION. Boletín de Coyuntura (BOCA), Boa Vista, v. 17, n. 49, p. 128–149, 2024. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10476865. Disponível em: https://revista.ioles.com.br/boca/index.php/revista/article/view/3013. Acesso em: 23 nov. 2024.
Sección
Artículos

Citas

ADAMOVIC, M. “The vicious cycle of unfairness and conflict in teams”. International Journal of Conflict Management, vol. 32, n. 1, 2020.

ADAMS, J. S. et al. “Desigualdade na troca social Complexidade e governança corporativa: uma análise das empresas listadas na BM&FBOVESPA”. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, vol. 28, n. 74, 2017.

AJATES, R. “Agricultural cooperatives remaining competitive in a globalized food system”. Organization, vol. 27, n. 2, 2020.

ALANOGLU, M.; DEMIRTAS, Z. “Management Styles’ Levels of Predicting Job Satisfaction and Burnout: Intermediary Role of Organizational Justice”. Education and Science, vol. 45, n. 204, 2020.

ALANOGLU, M.; KARABATAK S. “The mediating effects of job satisfaction and organizational justice on the relationship between principals' management style and teachers' organizational citizenship”. KEDI - Journal of Educational Policy, vol. 17, n. 2, 2020.

ALGHABABSHEH, M. et al. “Balancing the scales of justice: Do perceptions of buyers' justice drive suppliers' social performance?” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 163, n. 1, 2018.

ANGELIS, M. et al. “Job Insecurity and Job Performance: A Serial Mediated Relationship and the Buffering Effect of Organizational Justice”. Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 12, 2021.

ANSARI, Z. N.; KANT, R. “Exploring the Framework Development Status for Sustainability in Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Synthesis and Future Research Directions”. Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 26, n. 7, 2017.

BARLING, J.; PHILLIPS, M. “Justiça interacional, formal e distributiva no local de trabalho: um estudo exploratório”. Journal of Psychology, vol. 127, 1993.

BENÍTEZ-ÁVILA, C. et al. “Interação de governança relacional e contratual em parcerias público-privadas: o papel mediador das normas relacionais, confiança e contribuição dos parceiros”. International Journal Projeto Gerenciar, vol. 36, 2018.

BIES, R. J.; MOAG, J. F. Justiça interacional: Critérios de comunicação de equidade. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1986.

BIES, R. J.; SHAPIRO, D. L. “Julgamentos de justiça interacional: a influência de relatos causais”. Pesquisa de Justiça Social, vol. 1, 1987.

BOHREN, O.; ODEGAARD, B. A. “Governance and Performance Revisited”. Finance Working Paper Brussels, vol. 28, 2004.

BYRNE, N.; HEINONEN, K. “Equilibrando o domínio do cliente com relevância gerencial: o papel do lugar”. Anais do 23º Colóquio Internacional de Marketing de Relacionamento. Florianópolis: UFSC, 2015.

CHENG, E. C. K. et al. “A model for promoting student participation in school governance”. International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 15, n. 2, 2019.

CHRISTOPH, D. “Governance reforms, individualization of human resource management (HRM), and impact on workplace behavior…a black box?” Osuva Open Science, vol. 22, 2019.

COLIN, S. O. “Governance Strategy: a property right approach turning governance into action”. Journal of Manage Governance, vol. 11, n. 3, 2007.

COLQUITT, J. A. “Sobre a dimensionalidade da justiça organizacional: uma validação de construção de uma medida”. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 86, 2001.

CROPANZANO, R; PREHAR, C. A. “Usando a teoria da troca social para distinguir a justiça procedimental da interacional”. Anais da 14ª Reunião Annual da Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Atlanta: Abril, 1999.

CUGUERÓ-ESCOFET, N. et al. “Sustainable Human Resource Management: How to Create a Knowledge Sharing Behavior through Organizational Justice, Organizational Support, Satisfaction and Commitment”. Sustainability, vol. 11, n. 19, 2019.

DENG, M.; ZHANG, A. “Effect of Transaction Rules on Enterprise Transaction Costs Based on Williamson Transaction Cost Theory in Nanhai, China”. Sustainability, vol. 12, n. 3, 2020.

DENG. W.; JIA M. “How corporate social responsibility moderates the relationship between distributive unfairness and organizational revenge: a deontic justice perspective”. Chinese Management Studies, vol. 49, n. 7, 2022.

GHAFRAN, C.; YASMIN S. “Ethical Governance: Insight from the Islamic Perspective and an Empirical Enquiry”. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 167, 2019.

GRANDORI, A. “Inovação, incerteza e governança relacional”. Inovar, vol. 13, n. 2, 2006.

GRAVETT, S.; STELLA, A. “Enacting Organizational Justice and Institutional Learning in Faculty Dispute Resolution Processes: Lessons Learned from a Study of the UNC System”. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, vol. 32, n. 2, 2020.

GREENBERG J. “Uma taxonomia das teorias de justiça organizacional”. Academy Managent Review, vol. 12, n. 9, 1987.

GREENBERG, J. “A adolescência intelectual da justiça organizacional: você percorreu um longo caminho, talvez”. Pesquisa de Justiça Social, vol. 6, 1993.

HE, H. et al. “Sustainable Practicalities towards Good Governance in Fish Townships and Villages by Ethics-Based Approach”. Sutainability, vol. 14, n. 12, 2021.

JONES, D. A. “Getting even with one’s supervisor and one’s organization: relationships among types of injustice, desires for revenge, and counterproductive work behaviors”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 30, n. 4, 2009.

KUMAR, N. et al. “Conducting interorganizational research using key informants”. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 36, 1993.

LARSON, A. “Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: a study of governance of exchange relationships”. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 37, 1992.

LEVENTHAL, G. S. et al. “Além da justiça: uma teoria das preferências de alocação”. In. MIKULA, G. Justiça e Interação Social. Nova York: Springer, 1980.

LIAO, L. et al. “Sustainability’s forgotten third E: what influences local government actions on social equity?” Local Environment, vol. 24, n. 12, 2019.

LITTELL, J. H. et al. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.

LIU, R.; YANG, F. “Managing technology transfer between coopetitive firms: the roles of coopetition, asset specificity and justice”. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, vol. 36, n. 5, 2021.

LIU, X. et al. “Linking organizational justice with positive behavior in temporary organization: The mediating role of cooperative willingness”. Journal of General Management, vol. 48, n. 2, 2021.

LUO, Y. et al. “Improving performance and reducing cost in buyer–supplier relationships: The role of justice in curtailing opportunism”. Journal of Business Research, vol. 68, n. 3, 2015.

MATTA F. K. et al. “Exchanging One Uncertainty for Another: Justice Variability Negates the Benefits of Justice”. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 105, n. 1, 2020.

MEREDITH, J. “Theory Building through Conceptual Methods”. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol. 13, n. 5, 1993.

MIKAMI, K. et al. “Opportunism and trust in cross-national lateral collaboration: the Renault-Nissan Alliance and a theory of equity-trust”. Journal of World Business, vol. 57, n. 3, 2022.

MILES, J. A. “The Influence of Goal Commitment and Partner Status on Team Assignment Outcomes” Apllied Psychological, vol. 123, n. 3, 2019.

MILES, R. E. et al. “The Academy of Management Review”. Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process, vol. 3, n. 3, 1978.

MOHER, D. et al. “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement”. International Journal of Surgery, vol. 8, n. 5, 2010.

MOORMAN, R. H. “Relação entre justiça organizacional e comportamentos de cidadania organizacional: as percepções de justiça influenciam a cidadania dos funcionários?” Journal Apllied Psychological, vol. 76, 1995.

MUSAWIR, A. U. et al. “Project governance and its role in enabling organizational strategy implementation: A systematic literature review”. International Journal of Project Management, vol. 38, n. 1, 2020.

OECD - Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: OECD, 2004.

POPPO, L.; ZENGER, T. “Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 23, 2002.

RIISGAARD, L. et al. “Multistakeholder Initiatives in Global Production Networks Naturalizing Specific Understandings of Sustainability Through the Better Cotton Initiative”. Global Networks, vol. 20, n. 2, 2020.

SCHNEIBERG, M. “Movements as political conditions for diffusion: Anti-corporate movements and the spread of cooperative forms in American capitalism”. Organization Studies, vol. 34, n. 5, 2013.

SHLEIFER, A.; VISHNY, R. W. “A survey of Corporate Governance”. The Journal of Finance, vol. 52, n. 2, 1997.

SILVERNAIL, K. D. et al. “Perceived fairness of faculty governance: a study of 51 countries”. Higher Education, vol. 82, n. 3, 2021.

SIQUEIRA, L. C.; BIALOSKORSKI NETO, S. B. “Práticas de governança corporativa indicadas para monitoramento: uma análise do nível de adoção em cooperativas agropecuárias”. Economia das Organizações, vol. 1, 2014.

SKARLICKI, D. P.; FOLGER, R.; TESLUK, P. “Personality as a moderator in the relationship between fairness and retaliation”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42, n. 1, 1999.

SONG; H. et al. “From Contractual Flexibility to Contractor’s Cooperative Behavior in Construction Projects: The Multiple Mediation Effects of Ongoing Trust and Justice Perception”. Sustainability, vol. 13, n. 24, 2021.

SPINAK, E. “Indicadores cienciométricos”. Ciência da Informação, vol. 27, 1998.

STRUCKER, D. R.; HOFFMANN, M. G. “Participação social nos serviços públicos: caracterização do estado da arte por meio da bibliometria e da revisão sistemática”. Revista de Gestão, vol. 24, 2017.

SU, X. et al. “A Model and Complexity Analysis of the Relationship Based on Organizational Justice and Embeddedness Theories”. Complexity, vol. 2020, n. 3, 2020.

SWEENEY, P. D.; MCFARLIN, D. B. “Processo e resultado: Diferenças de gênero na avaliação da justiça”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 18, 1997.

TATA, J.; BOWES-SPERRY, L. “Ênfase na justiça distributiva, processual e interacional: percepções diferenciadas de homens e mulheres”. Psychological Reports, vol. 79, 1996.

THIBAUT, J.; WALKER, L. Justiça processual: uma análise psicológica. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1975.

TILL, R.; YOUNT M.B. “Governance and Incentives: Is It Really All about the Money?” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 159, n. 3, 2018.

UNTERHITZENBERGER, C.; MÖLLER D. “Fair Project Governance: An Organisational Justice Approach to Project Governance”. International Journal of Project Management, vol. 39, n. 8, 2021.

UZZI, B. “Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness”. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 42, 1997.

WANG, Y. Q. et al. “Organizational injustice perception and workplace deviance: mechanisms of negative emotion and traditionality”. Acta Psychologica Sinica, vol. 44. n. 12, 2012.

WESTABY, J. et al. “Estendendo a teoria de rede dinâmica para análise de grupo e interação social: revelando elementos comportamentais chave, ciclos e estados emergentes”. Psicologia em Revista, vol. 6, n. 1, 2016.

WHITEAOAK, J. “A relação dinâmica entre percepções de eficácia de grupo, atribuições e desempenho de tarefas”. Sociedade Behavior, vol. 5, n. 2, 2014.

WILLIAMSON, O. E. “Organização Econômica Comparada: a análise de alternativas estruturais discretas”. Quarterly Ciência Administrativa, vol. 36, n. 2. 1991.

WYMEERSCH, E. “Enforcement of Corporate Governance Codes”. ECGI - Law Working Paper, n. 46, 2005.

ZHANG L.; XI, G. “How Does Contractual Flexibility Affect a Contractor’s Opportunistic Behavior? Roles of Justice Perception and Communication Quality”. Buildings, vol. 13, n. 3, 2023.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a