AGENCY AND POWER OF INTERNATIONAL BUREAUCRACIES: THE ROLE OF THE UN SECRETARIAT IN THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF STANDARDS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article discusses the agency of the United Nations (UN) bureaucracy in the construction of a normative reference framework for the elaboration of policies and for the performance of activities entrusted to the organization. From a theoretical point of view, the discussion is supported, on the one hand, in the sociological institutionalist literature of International Relations, especially in the argument of Michael Barnett and Martha Finnemore about the relative autonomy of bureaucracies and their capacity for agency in the construction of social reality, through the institutionalization of norms and categories that influence the reading of reality, the questions or problems identified in it and the responses given to these by the actors, at different levels. The influence capacity of bureaucracies is partly associated with the accumulated expertise in certain areas of activity. To understand the development of this expertise in the UN bureaucratic structure, we will also resort to the International Public Administration (IPA) literature. From this perspective, the accumulation of specialized knowledge in certain areas occurs thanks to a complex administrative structure that seeks to operate in a coordinated and integrated way in the elaboration and planning of international action, in the monitoring and continuous evaluation of these actions and in learning based on experiences. in the field. From an empirical point of view, the discussion will take place based on the analysis of the role played by the UN Secretariat in the development of multinational peace operations. Therefore, in addition to the introduction and conclusion, the article is structured into two development topics: first, the bureaucracies are theoretically approached as agents in the international system, with the capacity to influence international politics; and second, theoretical knowledge is applied in observing the performance of the UN Secretariat in operationalizing decisions and normative directions related to peace operations. We conclude by emphasizing that the understanding of international bureaucracies as relatively autonomous actors allows a critical reflection on the relevance of International Organizations in the dynamics of the process of formulating international politics and in the construction of social reality, especially in the current moment, when the COVID-19 pandemic has been calling into question the capacity of International Organizations to deal with collective problems within their respective areas of activity.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c). Conjuncture Bulletin (BOCA)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
AXELROD, R.; KEOHANE, R. “Achieving cooperation under anarchy: strategies and institutions”. World Politics, vol. 1, n. 38, 1985.
BARNETT, M.; DUVALL, R. (eds.). Power in global governance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
BARNETT, M.; FINNEMORE, M. “The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations”. International Organization, vol. 4, n. 53, 1999.
BARNETT, M.; FINNEMORE, M. Rules for the world: international organizations in global politics. Washington: Cornell University Press, 2004.
BAUER, S.; et al. “Understanding International Bureaucracies: Taking Stock”. In: BIERMANN, F.; SIEBENHÜNER, B. (eds.). Managers of global change: influence of international environmental bureaucracies. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.
BAUER, M. W.; EGE, J. “International Bureaucracies from a Public Administration and International Relations Perspective”. In: REINALDA, B. (ed.). Routledge Handbook of International Organization. London: Routledge, 2013.
BAUER, M. W.; KNILL, C.; ECKHARD, S. (eds.). International Bureaucracy: Challenges and Lessons for Public Administration Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
BIERMANN, F.; SIEBENHÜNER, B. (eds.). Managers of global change: influence of international environmental bureaucracies. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2009.
ECKHARD, S.; STEINEBACH, I. “Staff recruitment and geographical representation in international organizations”. International Review of Admnistrative Sciences, vol. 87, n. 4, 2021.
FINNEMORE, M.; SIKKINK, K. “International norm dynamics and political change”. International Organization, vol. 52, n. 4, 1998.
FLEISCHER, J.; REINERS, N. “Connecting International Relations and Public Administration: Toward A Joint Research Agenda for the Study of International Bureaucracy”. International Studies Review, n. 23, 2021.
GORDENKER, L. The UN Secretary-General and Secretariat. London: Routledge, 2005.
GROVOGUI, S. N. “Mind, body, and gut! Elements of a postcolonial human rights discourse”. In: JONES, B. G. (ed.) Decolonizing international relations. Washington: RowMan and Littlefield Publishers, 2006.
GUEDES, T. A.; SILVA, F. S. “Gestão de Saúde Pública no Brasil à luz da teoria da burocracia: escassez de médicos especialistas e desigualdade regional de acesso”. Boletim de Conjuntura (BOCA), vol. 13, n. 37, 2023.
HERZ, M.; HOFFMANN, A. R. Organizações Internacionais: história e práticas. São Paulo: Editora Elsevier, 2004.
JOHNSTONE, I. “The role of the UN Secretary-general”. Global Governance, n. 9, 2003.
KNILL, C.; STEINEBACH, I. (eds.). International Public Administrations in Global Public Policy: Sources and effects of bureaucratic influence. London: Routledge, 2023.
LACERDA, J. M. A. F. A influência da ONU, da OEA, dos seus corpos burocráticos e de suas interações administrativas na promoção e na defesa da democracia na América Latina (Tese de Doutorado em Ciência Política). Recife: UFPE, 2017.
LITTOZ-MONNET, A. “Production and uses of expertise by international bureaucracies”. In: LITTOZ-MONNET, A. (ed.). The Politics of Expertise in International Organizations: How Bureaucracies Produce and Mobilize Knowlegdge. London: Routledge, 2017.
MELO, R. B. C. L. O processo de institucionalização das operações de paz multidimensionais da ONU no pós-guerra fria: direitos humanos, polícia civil e assistência eleitoral (Tese de Doutorado em Relações Internacionais). Rio de Janeiro: PUC-Rio, 2006.
MOURITZEN, H. The international civil service: a study of bureaucracy: international organizations. London: Dartmouth, 1990.
PÉREZ DE CUÉLLAR, J. “The role of the UN Secretary-general”. In: ROBERTS, A.; KINGSBURY, B. United Nations, divided world: the UN’s roles in international relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
RUGGIE, J. “International Responses to Technology: Concepts and Trends”. International Organization, vol. 29, n. 3, 1975.
RUGGIE, J. Constructing the world polity: essays on international institutionalization. Washington: Routledge, 1998.
ONU - Organização das Nações Unidas. An agenda for peace: Report of the Secretary-General. New York, 1992.
ONU - Organização das Nações Unidas. Relatório da Comissão da Verdade. New York: ONU,1993.
ONU - Organização das Nações Unidas. The United Nations and El Salvador 1990-1995. New York: ONU, 1995.
ONU - Organização das Nações Unidas. The United Nations and Rwanda 1993-1996. New York: ONU, 1996.
ONU - Organização das Nações Unidas. Report on the Independent Inquiry into the actions of the United Nations during the 1994 genocide in Ruanda. New York: ONU, 1999.
ONU - Organização das Nações Unidas. Report of the panel on United Nations Peace Operations - Brahimi Report. New York: ONU, 2000.
ONU - Organização das Nações Unidas. A more secure world: our shared responsibility: Report of the Secretary-general’s high-level panel on threats, challenges and change. New York: ONU, 2004.
ONU - Organização das Nações Unidas. United Nations Peacekeeping Operations: Principles and Guidelines (“The Capstone Doctrine”). New York: ONU, 2008.
ONU - Organização das Nações Unidas. A New Partnership Agenda: Charting a New Horizon for UN Peacekeeping. New York: ONU, 2009.
ONU - Organização das Nações Unidas. Report of the Independent High-Level Panel on UN Peace Operations. New York: ONU, 2015.
ONU - Organização das Nações Unidas. The future of United Nations peace operations: implementation of the recommendations of the High-level Independent Panel on Peace Operations. Relatório do Secretário-Geral. New York: ONU, 2015.
WEBER, M. Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
WEBER, M. Ensaios de sociologia. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Guanabara, 1982.
WEISS, T. G.; CARAYANNIS, T.; JOLLY, R. “The ‘Third’ United Nations”. Global Governance, vol. 15, n. 1, 2009.
WENDT, A. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
YOUNG, O. “Political leadership and regime formation: on the development of institutions in international society”. In: MARTIN, L. L.; SIMMONS, B. International institutions. London: MIT Press, 2001.