LEGIBILITY OF AUDIT REPORTS AND IMPACT ON THE JUDGMENT OF GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTS

Main Article Content

Tatiana Alves de Paula
Diego Rodrigues Boente

Abstract

The research aimed to measure the readability of the audit reports prepared and released by the Audit Office (AO) of Rio Grande do Sul, to examine the impacts of these documents on the judgments of the mayors made by the councilors. The applied methodology was the content analysis of the AO documents to measure the readability and then, a estimation was performed by logistics regression. The main results show that they were not found statistically a relationship between the technical documents sent by the AO to the municipal legislature and the judgments of the mayors. The research delivers an academic contribution, the analysis of the readability of the opinions of the AO, a starting point for future research in external control; It was delivered to AO, concluding that audit reports need quality to be well understood and thus become useful by the legislature.

Article Details

How to Cite
PAULA, T. A. de .; BOENTE, D. R. LEGIBILITY OF AUDIT REPORTS AND IMPACT ON THE JUDGMENT OF GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTS. Conjuncture Bulletin (BOCA), Boa Vista, v. 19, n. 57, p. 145–164, 2024. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13910591. Disponível em: https://revista.ioles.com.br/boca/index.php/revista/article/view/5395. Acesso em: 16 oct. 2024.
Section
Articles

References

ALLINI, A. et al. “From accountability to readability in the public sector: Evidence from Italian universities”. International Journal of Business and Management, vol. 12, n. 3, 2017.

ALMQUIST, R. et al. “Public sector governance and accountability”. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 24, n. 7, 2013.

ASAY, H. S.; LIBBY, R.; RENNEKAMP, K. “Firm performance, reporting goals, and language choices in narrative disclosures”. Journal of Accounting Economics, vol. 65, n. 2, 2018.

BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Editora Setenta, 2016.

BLANCO, B. et al. “How do auditors respond to low annual report readability?” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, vol. 40, n. 3, 2021.

BRADBURY, M. E. et al. “Summary annual reports: length, readability and content”. Accounting and Finance, vol. 60, n. 3, 2020.

BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília: Planalto, 1988. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 12 dez. 2023.

BORALI, N.; DALMÁCIO, F. Z. “Fatores Formais Dos Pareceres Irregulares Proferidos Pelo Tribunal De Contas Do Estado De São Paulo entre 2000 e 2013”. Revista Liceu, vol. 14, n. 1, 2024.

BUSUIOC, M.; LODGE, M. “Reputation and accountability relationships: Managing accountability expectations through reputation”. Public Administration Review, vol. 77, n. 1, 2017.

CALDAS, O. V.; FREIRE, F. S. “Determinantes do Nível de Legibilidade das Prestações de Contas dos Entes Federativos Estaduais no Brasil”. Revista FSA, vol. 17, n. 7, 2020.

CRUZ, T. et al. “Internal transparency: compliance and punishment in the Brazilian municipal budget process”. Revista de Administração Pública, vol. 55, 2021.

FERNÁNDEZ, Ó. S. “La claridad de la información narrativa en las empresas cotizadas españolas”. Revista de Gestão, Finanças e Contabilidade, vol. 3, n. 3, 2013.

HEALD, D. “Transparency-generated trust: The problematic theorization of public audit”. Financial Accountability and Management, Edinburgh, vol. 34, n. 4, 2018.

HIDALGO, F. D. et al. “Can politicians police themselves? Natural experimental evidence from Brazil’s audit courts”. Comparative Political Studies, vol. 49, n. 13, 2016.

KEUNECKE, L. P. et al. “Práticas de Accountability: uma análise do índice de transparência nos municípios mais populosos de Santa Catarina”. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, vol. 8, n. 16, 2011.

LAUREANO, R. V. et al. “Divergências entre o posicionamento dos auditores públicos e dos conselheiros do TCE-RS na análise da LRF”. Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting, vol. 10, n. 1, 2017.

LAWRENCE, A. “Individual investors and financial disclosure”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 56, n. 1, 2013.

LI, F. “Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 45, n. 2, 2008.

LINO, A. F.; AQUINO, A. C. B. D. “Práticas não adequadas nos tribunais de contas”. Revista de Administração Pública, vol. 54, n. 2, 2020.

LO, K. et al. “Earnings management and annual report readability”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 63, n. 1, 2017.

LOUGHRAN, T.; MCDONALD, B. “Textual analysis in accounting and finance: a survey”. Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 4, n. 4, 2016.

LOUGHRAN, T.; MCDONALD, B. “Measuring readability in financial disclosures”. The Journal of Finance, vol. 69, n. 4, 2014.

MELÓN-IZCO, A; RUIZ-CABESTRE, F. J.; RUIZ-OLALLA, C. “La legibilidad en los informes de gestión: extensión y buenas prácticas de gobierno corporativo”. Revista de Contabilidad, vol. 24, n. 1, 2021.

MICHENER, G.; CRUZ, T. L. P.; BENEDICTO, F. S. “Evaluating the quality of transparency laws: propositions for measurements and explanations”. The Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 27, 2021.

SALEHI, M.; ZIMON, G.; SEIFZADEH, M. “The effect of management characteristics on audit report readability”. Economies, vol. 10, n. 1, 2022.

YU, Z. “Financial report readability and accounting conservatism”. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 15, n. 10, 2022.

Most read articles by the same author(s)