AMF: AGILE METRICS FRAMEWORK AS A SUPPORT TOOL FOR AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Main Article Content
Abstract
The change in organizational mentality over the years has been an important factor in controlling and monitoring project management, especially in the context of software development. The objective of this study was to validate the Agile Metrics Framework (AMF) through practitioners in agile project management. The research has a qualitative approach and empirical methodology, using the focus group research technique, carried out with agile project management practitioners in different organizations. The results showed that AMF is a framework for feedback and continuous improvement of the team and the organization based on agile metrics. Furthermore, the results highlighted that AMF can be applied at different levels of maturity and scale in agile projects, in addition to presenting results of adherence to agile practices such as Design Sprint, Lean Inception, Design Thinking, Scrum, Kanban, Extreme Programming and DevOps . As a practical contribution, this research offers insights into the use of agile practices and effective leadership in projects to improve the application of agile metrics in organizations. Regarding academic contributions, this research enriches academic knowledge on topics about leadership in agile projects, about the use of agile tools such as Kanban and DevOps. Finally, limitations and future work were identified with the aim of exploring implementation costs and validating the effectiveness of AMF in different organizations.
Article Details
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c). Conjuncture Bulletin (BOCA)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
ALMEIDA, F.; CARNEIRO, P. “Perceived Importance of Metrics for Agile Scrum Environments”. Information, vol. 14, n. 6, 2023.
AZANHA NETO, J. D. S. et al. “The importance of leadership in agile projects: systematic literature review”. Research, Society and Development, vol. 11, n. 5, 2022.
AZANHA NETO, J. D. S.; PENHA, R. “Estudo de Patentes sobre Métricas para a Gestão Ágil de Projetos”. South American Development Society Journal, vol. 9, n. 27, 2023.
BANNACH, D. G.; SILVA, R. F.; WITT, C. “Aplicação do QFD em um projeto de desenvolvimento de software de horários acadêmicos”. Boletim de Conjuntura (BOCA), vol. 16, n. 47, 2023.
BEH, H. C.; JUSOH, Y. Y.; ABDULLAH, R. “Dimensions in Measuring Performance of Agile Software Development Projects: A Literature Review”. Applied Informatics International Conference. Washington: IEEE, 2022.
BLANK, S.; ECKHARDT, J. T. “The lean startup as an actionable theory of entrepreneurship”. Journal of Management, vol. 0, 2023.
COGSWELL, J. E.; MARSHALL, C. J.; SMITH, L. D. “The Makings of a Servant Leader: The Role of Personality and Character in Effective Servant Leadership”. In: DHIMAN, S. K. The Palgrave Handbook of Servant Leadership. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023.
DIAS, M. O.; TELES, A. C. “Virtual Focus Group Methodology–Example from IT Industry”. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, vol. 4, n. 2, 2023.
DORNINGER, B.; ZIEBERMAYR, T. “Software-Qualitätssicherung im Maschinen-und Anlagenbau: automatisierte Bewertung der technischen Qualität von SPS-Code”. e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, vol. 138, n. 6, 2021.
FISCHER, E.; GUZEL, G. T. “The case for qualitative research”. Journal of Consumer Psychology, vol. 33, n. 1, 2023.
GOKARNA, M.; SINGH, R. “DevOps: a historical review and future works”. International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems. New Delhi: IEEE, 2021.
HUIĆ, I.; HORVAT, N.; ŠKEC, S. “Design sprint: Use of design methods and technologies”. Proceedings of the Design Society, vol. 3, 2023.
HUSS, M.; HERBER, D. R.; BORKY, J. M. “Comparing Measured Agile Software Development Metrics Using an Agile Model-Based Software Engineering Approach versus Scrum Only”. Software, vol. 2, n. 3, 2023.
KÄLLSTRÖM, A.; WESTERBERG, J. From chaos to cohesion: identifying inter-team dependencies in large-scale agile organisations (Master’s Thesis in Projects, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship), Linköping: LIU, 2023.
KAPLAN, A. et al. “Robotic technology for Parkinson's disease: Needs, attitudes and concerns of individuals with Parkinson's disease and their family members”. A focus group study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 181, 2024.
LOBÃO, L. et al. “The use of Design Thinking in creating projects and improving customer value perception: an experience report on software projects at a Research and Development Institute in Amazonas”. Proceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality. São Paulo: USP, 2023.
MARNEWICK, C.; ROMERO-TORRES, A.; DELISLE, J. “Rich pictures as a research method in project management–A way to engage practitioners”. Project Leadership and Society, vol. 5, 2024.
MEDEIROS, O. F. et al. “O Efeito moderador da virtualidade na relação entre comunicação e sucesso em projetos”. Boletim de Conjuntura (BOCA), vol. 17, n. 51, 2024.
ORLOV, E. V. et al. “Comparative analysis of the use of kanban and scrum methodologies in it projects”. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, vol. 9, n. 4, 2021.
PRADO, L. A.; TASSA, K. O. M. E. “Desafios e inquietações da docência: a transição de alunos público-alvo da educação especial no ensino fundamental”. Boletim de Conjuntura (BOCA), vol. 15, n. 44, 2023.
RAHMAN, A. et al. “Systematic Literature Review: TPACK-Integrated Design Thinking in Education”. International Journal of English and Literature, vol. 2, n. 1, 2023.
SARDANA, N. et al. “Qualitative and quantitative research methods”. In: KAYE, E. D. et al. Substance Use and Addiction Research. London: Academic Press, 2023.
SENAPATHI, M.; DRURY‐GROGAN, M. L. “Systems thinking approach to implementing kanban: A case study”. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, vol. 33, n. 4, 2021.
SILVA, C. R.; BRAGA, J. L. “Gestão do conhecimento potencializando a gestão de riscos de projetos de desenvolvimento de software ágil utilizando o SCRUM”. Fronteiras da Representação do Conhecimento, vol. 1, n. 1, 2023.
SILVA, R. V.; SOUZA, G. D. S. “Surveying the Academic Literature on the Use of OKR (Objective and Key Results)”. Proceedings of the XIX Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems. São Paulo: SBSI, 2023.
SINGH, A. “Book review: Jeff Sutherland. 2014. Scrum The Art of Doing Twice the Work in Half the Time”. Metamorphosis, vol. 22, n. 2, 2023.
SONNENBERG, M. et al. “Implementing a continuous improvement model for assignment evaluation at the technical and professional communication program level”. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, vol. 54, n. 1, 2024.
STRAY, V. et al. “Using Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) and Slack: A Case Study of Coordination in Large-Scale Distributed Agile”. Research Gate [2023]. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 23/01/2024.
SUGUNA, S.; RAJIV KUMAR, R. “Quantitative and Qualitative Schedule Risk Analysis Using Primavera in Residential Sector”. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, vol. 8, n. 7, 2023.
SÜẞ, J. G.; SWIFT, S.; ESCOTT, E. “Using DevOps toolchains in Agile model-driven engineering”. Software and Systems Modeling, vol. 21, n. 4, 2022.
THIOLLENT, M. Metodologia da pesquisa-ação. São Paulo: Editora Cortez, 2022.
ZAREI, M.; SUPPHELLEN, M; BAGOZZI, R. P. “Research streams, gaps and opportunities in servant leadership research”. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, vol. 45, n. 2, 2024.