CORONÓPTICO DIGITAL: O ESTADO DE EXCEÇÃO SE TORNARÁ PERMANENTE?
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
It is an investigation of the impact of the pandemic on the State's surveillance powers. Its aim is to answer whether there can be an increase in surveillance and whether the created State of exception can become permanent. It starts with a positive hypothesis. Surveillance has been around for a long time, but the occurrence of a pandemic consolidates the justification for protecting people at the expense of individual privacy. The method is the hypothetical-deductive, through which it confirms the initial hypothesis using bibliographic research, document collection and analysis. The different forms of panopticon are investigated to better address the problem. The conclusion indicates an increase in State power legitimized by the advance of the pandemic and the fear caused by it. New technologies seem to help build the idea of a permanent state of exception.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c). Conjuncture Bulletin (BOCA)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
BAUMAN, Zygmunt; LYON, David. Vigilância líquida. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Zahar, 2013.
BENTHAM, Jeremy. O panóptico. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica Editora, 2008.
COLOMÉ, Jordi Pérez. “Como você é espionado por seu celular Android sem saber”. El País [17/03/2019]. Disponível em: <https://brasil.elpais.com>. Acesso em: 16/06/2020.
FAHIM, Kareem; KIM, Min Joo; HENDRIX, Steve. “Cellphone monitoring is spreading with the coronavirus: so is an uneasy tolerance of surveillance”. The Washington Post [02/05/2020]. Disponível em: <https://www.washingtonpost.com>. Acesso em: 13/06/2020.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Vigiar e punir: nascimento da prisão. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes, 2013.
FRIEDERSDORF, Conor. “The costs of spying”. The Atlantic [28/02/2020]. Disponível em: <https://www.theatlantic.com>. Acesso em: 13/06/2020.
KUO, Lily. “'The new normal': China's excessive coronavirus public monitoring could be here to stay”. The Guardian [09/03/2020]. Disponível em: <https://www.theguardian.com>. Acesso em: 16/06/2020.
LA BOÉTIE, Étienne De. Discurso sobre a servidão voluntária. São Paulo: Edipro, 2017.
LACERDA, Marcos. “Governança na pandemia: a ciência como regulação moral e os problemas da biopolítica”. Simbiótica Revista Eletrônica, vol. 7, n. 1, 2020.
LIN, Liza; MARTIN, Timothy W. “How coronavirus is eroding privacy”. The Wall Street Journal [15/04/2020]. Disponível em: <https://www.wsj.com>. Acesso em: 16/06/2020.
MANOKHA, Ivan. “Surveillance, panopticism, and self-discipline in the digital age”. Surveillance & Society, v.16, n.2, p.219-237, 2018.
McMULLAN, Thomas. “What does the panopticon mean in the age of digital surveillance?”. The Guardian [23/06/2020]. Disponível em: <https://www.theguardian.com>. Acesso em: 13/06/2020.
ORWELL, George. Nineteen Eighty-Four. London: Everyman’s library, 1992.
REIMAN, Jeffrey H. “Driving to the panopticon: a philosophical exploration of the risks to privacy posed by the highway technology of the future”. Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, vol. 11, n. 1, 1995.
ROMELE, Alberto; EMMENEGGER, Camilla; GALLINO, Francesco; GORGONE, Daniele. “Panopticism is not enough: social media as technologies of voluntary servitude”. Surveillance & Society, vol. 15, n. 2, 2017.
SIMON, Bart. “The return of panopticism: supervision, subjection and the new surveillance”. Surveillance & Society, vol. 3, n. 1, 2002.
TAEKKE, Jesper. “Digital panopticism and organizational power”. Surveillance & Society, vol. 8, n. 4, 2011.
THE ECONOMIST. “Countries are using apps and data networks to keep tabs on the pandemic”. The Economist [26/03/2020]. Disponível em: <https://www.economist.com>. Acesso em: 12/06/2020.
UCL - University College London. “Bentham Project”. UCL Website [2020]. Disponível em: <https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bentham-project>. Acesso em: 12/06/2020.
ZAMYATIN, Yevgeny. We. London: Vintage, 2007.