OVERVIEW DE REVISÕES SISTEMÁTICAS: COMPARAÇÃO ENTRE A CÂNULA NASAL DE ALTO FLUXO E A OXIGENOTERAPIA CONVENCIONAL
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Foi realizada uma revisão geral das revisões sistemáticas (RSs) sobre os efeitos da cânula nasal de alto fluxo (CNAF) em comparação com a oxigenoterapia convencional (OC) em adultos e o nível de confiabilidade dos estudos. O objetivo do estudo foi comparar a CNAF em relação à OC na Insuficiência respiratória aguda (IRpA). Metodologicamente, as buscas foram realizadas em três bases de dados e literatura cinzenta entre fevereiro e março de 2023. Doze RSs foram selecionadas. Os desfechos avaliados foram mortalidade, risco de intubação, tempo de internação, necessidade de maior suporte respiratório/falha do tratamento, PaO2/FiO2 e nível de CO2. A ferramenta para avaliar a qualidade metodológica das RSs incluídas foi a AMSTAR 2. Os resultados deste estudo apontam que Das 12 RSs incluídas, 5 eram RSs com meta-análise de rede e 7 RSs com meta-análise convencional. A avaliação de confiança das RSs foi estratificada como moderada em uma, baixa em oito e criticamente baixa em três. A conclusão da pesquisa é de que a CNAF pode reduzir o risco de intubação e a escalada do suporte respiratório em pacientes adultos com IRpA. A confiança geral dos estudos foi muito baixa. Os dados são inconclusivos quanto ao impacto da CNAF na oxigenação e nos níveis de CO2. Não houve efeito da CNAF sobre a mortalidade e o tempo de internação na unidade de terapia intensiva e no hospital. Este overview poderá ser útil nas decisões clínicas, melhoria da qualidade assistencial, e na avaliação de incorporação de tecnologias em saúde.
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Copyright (c). Boletim de Coyuntura (BOCA)
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional.
Citas
AGARWAL, A. et al. “Authors seldom report the most patient-important outcomes and absolute effect measures in systematic review abstracts”. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 81, 2017.
ARAUJO NETO, J. P. “Toxicidade do Oxigênio Implicações Clínicas”. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology, vol. 36, n. 6, 1986.
AZOULAY, E. et al. “Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in immunocompromised patients: the Efraim multinational prospective cohort study”. Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 43, n. 12, 2017.
AZOULAY, E. et al. “Effect of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen vs Standard Oxygen on 28-Day Mortality in Immunocompromised Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure”. JAMA, vol. 320, n. 20, 2018.
BRASIL. RDC n. 166, de 24 de julho de 2017. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2017. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 06/04/2024.
CHENG, L. C. et al. “The Impact of High-Flow Nasal Cannula on the Outcome of Immunocompromised Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. Medicine, vol. 55, n. 10, 2019.
CIMINO, K. M. “An exploration of the deleterious effects of hyperoxemia on the morbidity and mortality of hospitalized adult patients”. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, vol. 31, n. 5, 2019.
CORTEGIANI, A. et al. “High flow nasal therapy in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis”. Journal of Critical Care, vol. 50, 2019.
DAMIANI, E.; DONATI, A.; GIRARDIS, M. “Oxygen in the critically ill: friend or foe?”. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology, vol. 31, n. 2, 2018.
FERRER, S. et al. “ROX index as predictor of high flow nasal cannula therapy success in acute respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2”. Respiratory Medicine, vol. 189, 2021.
FERREYRO, B. L. et al. “Association of Noninvasive Oxygenation Strategies With All-Cause Mortality in Adults With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure”. JAMA, vol. 324, n. 1, 2020.
HELMERHORST, H. J. et al. “Hyperoxia provokes a time-and dose-dependent inflammatory response in mechanically ventilated mice, irrespective of tidal volumes”. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, vol. 5, 2017.
HUANG, H. W. et al. “Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy and Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation Rate in Adult Patients After Extubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials”. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 33, n. 11, 2018.
LEEIES, M. et al. “High-flow oxygen via nasal cannulae in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Systematic Reviews, vol. 6, n. 1, 2017.
LEMIALE, V. et al. “Effect of Noninvasive Ventilation vs Oxygen Therapy on Mortality Among Immunocompromised Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure”. JAMA, vol. 314, n. 16, 2015.
LEWIS, S. R. et al. “High-flow nasal cannulae for respiratory support in adult intensive care patients”. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2021, n. 3, 2021.
LIBERATI, A. et al. “The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration”. PLoS Medicine, vol. 6, n. 7, 2009.
LIN, S. et al. “Does high-flow nasal cannula oxygen improve outcome in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure? A systematic review and meta-analysis”. Respiratory Medicine, vol. 131, 2017.
MAGGIORE, S. M. et al. “Nasal High-Flow versus Venturi Mask Oxygen Therapy after Extubation. Effects on Oxygenation, Comfort, and Clinical Outcome”. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 190, n. 3, 2014.
MAITRA, S. et al. “Comparison of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy with conventional oxygen therapy and noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: A meta-analysis and systematic review”. Journal of Critical Care, vol. 35, 2016.
MONRO-SOMERVILLE, T. et al. “The Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy on Mortality and Intubation Rate in Acute Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. Critical Care Medicine, vol. 45, n. 4, 2017.
NEDEL, W. L.; DEUTSCHENDORF, C.; MORAES RODRIGUES FILHO, E. “High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Critically Ill Subjects With or at Risk for Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. Respiratory Care, vol. 62, n. 1, 2017.
NI, Y. N. et al. “Can High-flow Nasal Cannula Reduce the Rate of Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy and Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation?”. Chest, vol. 151, n. 4, 2017.
NI, Y. N. et al. “The effect of high-flow nasal cannula in reducing the mortality and the rate of endotracheal intubation when used before mechanical ventilation compared with conventional oxygen therapy and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. A systematic review and meta-analysis”. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 36, n. 2, 2018.
O'DRISCOLL, B. R. et al. “BTS guideline for oxygen use in adults in healthcare and emergency settings”. Thorax, vol. 72, n. Suppl 1, 2017.
OKANO, H. et al. “Respiratory support strategy in adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis”. JA Clinical Reports, vol. 8, n. 1, 2022.
OU, X. et al. “Effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials”. Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 189, n. 7, 2017.
OUZZANI, M. et al. “Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews”. Systematic Reviews, vol. 5, n. 1, 2016.
PALA CIFCI, S. et al. “The impact of hyperoxia on outcome of patients treated with noninvasive respiratory support”. Canadian Respiratory Journal, vol. 2020, n. 1, 2020.
PARKE, R.; MCGUINNESS, S.; ECCLESTON, M. “Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure”. British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 103, n. 6, 2009.
RICARD, J. D. “High flow nasal oxygen in acute respiratory failure”. Minerva anestesiologica, vol. 78, n. 7, 2012.
ROCA, O. et al. “Current evidence for the effectiveness of heated and humidified high flow nasal cannula supportive therapy in adult patients with respiratory failure”. Critical Care, vol. 20, n. 1, 2016.
ROCA, O. et al. “High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure”. Respiratory care, vol. 55, n. 4, 2010.
ROCHWERG, B. et al. “High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 45, 2019.
ROCHWERG, B. et al. “The role for high flow nasal cannula as a respiratory support strategy in adults: a clinical practice guideline”. Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 46, 2020.
RODRÍGUEZ-GONZÁLEZ, R. et al. “Multiple system organ response induced by hyperoxia in a clinically relevant animal model of sépsis”. Shock, vol. 42, n. 2, 2014.
SAKURAYA, M. et al. “Efficacy of non-invasive and invasive respiratory management strategies in adult patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis”. Critical Care, vol. 25, n. 1, 2021.
SCHWABBAUER, N. et al. “Nasal high–flow oxygen therapy in patients with hypoxic respiratory failure: effect on functional and subjective respiratory parameters compared to conventional oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation (NIV)”. BMC Anesthesiology, vol. 14, n. 1, 2014.
SHEA, B. J. et al. “AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both”. BMJ, vol. 358, 2017.
SHULTZ, S. M.; HARTMANN, P. M. “George E Holtzapple (1862–1946) and oxygen therapy for lobar pneumonia: the first reported case (1887) and a review of the contemporary literature to 1899”. Journal of Medical Biography, vol. 13, n. 4, 2005.
SIEMIENIUK, R. A. et al. “Oxygen therapy for acutely ill medical patients: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ, vol. 363, 2018.
SKLAR, M. C. et al. “The Impact of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen in the Immunocompromised Critically Ill: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. Respiratory Care, vol. 63, n. 12, 2018.
SMITH, V. et al. “Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions”. BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 11, n. 1, 2011.
STOLMEIJER, R. et al. “A systematic review of the effects of hyperoxia in acutely ill patients: should we aim for less?”. BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, n. 1, 2018.
TINELLI, V. et al. “High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen vs. Conventional Oxygen Therapy and Noninvasive Ventilation in Emergency Department Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 57, n. 3, 2019.
WANG, Y. et al. “Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Immunocompromise and Acute Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 58, n. 3, 2020.
XU, Z. et al. “High-flow nasal cannula in adults with acute respiratory failure and after extubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Respiratory Research, vol. 19, n. 1, 2018.
YASUDA, H. et al. “Association of noninvasive respiratory support with mortality and intubation rates in acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis”. Journal of Intensive Care, vol. 9, n. 1, 2021a.
YASUDA, H. et al. “Post-extubation oxygenation strategies in acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis” Critical Care, vol. 25, n. 1, 2021b.
ZAYED, Y. et al. “Initial Noninvasive Oxygenation Strategies in Subjects With De Novo Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure”. Respiratory Care, vol. 64, n. 11, 2019.
ZHAO, H. et al. “High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy is superior to conventional oxygen therapy but not to noninvasive mechanical ventilation on intubation rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Critical Care, vol. 21, n. 1, 2017.
ZHU, Y. et al. “High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials”. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, vol. 17, n. 1, 2017.