HOW CAN GOVERNMENT AUDIT REDUCE CORRUPTION? CASE STUDY OF THE DRAW AUDIT PROGRAM OF MUNICIPALITIES OF THE CONTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNION
Main Article Content
Abstract
The wrongful exercise of authority over the use of public money is a major issue for public governance in many countries. As a tool of public governance, auditing is often directed against public officeholders' corrupt activities and behavior. This paper seeks to advance knowledge about applying auditing for this purpose. It clarifies two broad necessities of auditing-against-corruption: (a) preventing and detecting the corrupt activities and behavior of a target population of public officeholders; and (b) forestalling political pressure against the audit agency's independence in government and/or the professional discretion of its auditing staff. These twin necessities of auditing-against-corruption do not sit easily together, which poses a challenge for audit agency leadership. The paper shows how these characteristic challenges of auditing-against-corruption can be neutralized, through a case study of a nation-wide auditing program of Brazil’s Controller-General Office, where the target population was top local government officeholders. The case analysis can be used as a design precedent for program implementation and organizational leadership in other settings where auditing-against-corruption is the part of the audit agency's strategy.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c). Conjuncture Bulletin (BOCA)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
ABBOTT, A. Processual Sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2016.
ARANHA, A. “Accountability, Corruption and Local Government: Mapping the control steps”. Brazilian Political Science Review, vol. 11, n. 2, 2017.
AVIS, E.; FERRAZ, C.; FINAN, F. “Do government audits reduce corruption? Estimating the impacts of exposing corrupt politicians”. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 126, n. 5, 2018.
BALBE, R. Controle Interno e o Foco nos Resultados. Belo Horizonte: Editora Fórum, 2013.
BARBABELA, L. “Anti-corruption Audits and Citizens’ Trust in Audit and Auditee Institutions”. Latin American Politics and Society [2024]. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 23/04/2024.
BARZELAY, M. "Learning from Second-Hand Experience: Methodology for Extrapolation-Oriented Case Research". Governance, vol. 20, n. 2, 2007.
BARZELAY, M. “Central Audit Institutions and Performance Auditing: A Comparative Analysis of Organizational Strategies in the OECD”. Governance, vol. 10, n. 2, 1997.
BARZELAY, M.; ANDRENACCI, L.; SEABRA, S.; YAN, Y. “Good trouble in the academy: inventing design-focused case studies about public management as an archetype of policy design research”. In: PETERS, B. G.; FONTAINE, G. Research handbook of policy design. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022.
BARZELAY, M.; CAMPBELL, C. Preparing for the future: Strategic planning in the US Air Force. Washington: Brookings, 2003.
BAUMGARTNER, F. R.; JONES, B. D. “Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems”. Journal of Politics, vol. 53, n. 4, 1991.
BECKER, G. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach”. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 76, 1968.
BECKER, G.; STIGLER, G. “Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers”. The Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 3, n. 1, 1974.
BOBONIS, G. J.; CAMARA FUERTES, L. R.; SCHWABE, R. “Monitoring Corruptible Politicians”. American Economic Review, vol. 106, n. 8, 2016.
BRANET, D.; HATEGAN, C. “Bibliometric Framing of Research Trends Regarding Public Sector Auditing to Fight Corruption and Prevent Fraud”. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 17, n. 3, 2024.
BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília: Planalto, 1988. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 23/02/2024.
BRASIL. Medida Provisória n. 103, de 01 de janeiro de 2003. Brasília: Planalto, 2003. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 23/02/2024.
BRASIL. Medida Provisória n. 480, de 07 de abril de 1994. Brasília: Planalto, 1994. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 23/02/2024.
BRASIL. Relatório Anual de Prestação de Contas do Presidente da República. Brasília: CGU, 2002. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 23/02/2024.
CYERT, M.; MARCH, J. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1963.
EISENHARDT, K. “Building theories from case study research”. Academy of Management Review, vol. 14, n. 4, 1989.
FERRAZ, C.; FINAN, F. “Electoral accountability and corruption: Evidence from the audits of local governments”. American Economic Review, vol. 101, n. 4, 2011.
FLIGSTEIN, N.; MCADAM, D. A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
GIDDENS, A. Central Problems in Social Theory. London: MacMillan, 1979.
GOFFMAN, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books, 1959.
GUSTAVSON, M.; SUNDSTRÖM, A. “Organizing the Audit Society: Does Good Auditing Generate Less Public Sector Corruption?”. Administration and Society, vol. 50, 2016.
HILGARTNER, S. Science on Stage: expert advice as public drama. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.
LEVY, R.; BARZELAY, M.; PORRAS-GOMEZ, A. “The Reform of Financial Management in the European Commission: A Public Management Policy Cycle Case Study”. Public Administration, vol. 89, n. 4, 2011.
LICHAND, G.; LOPES, M.; MEDEIROS, M. “Is corruption good for your health?”. Harvard University [2016]. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 06/06/2024.
LINO, A. et al. “Fighting or supporting corruption? The role of public sector audit organizations in Brazil”. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 83, 2022.
MILES, M.; HUBERMAN, A.; SALDAÑA, J. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2020.
MOORE, M. Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.
OLIVIERI, C. A Lógica Política do Controle Interno: O monitoramento das políticas públicas no presidencialismo brasileiro. São Paulo: Editora Annablume, 2010.
OLKEN, B. A. “Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia”. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 115, 2007.
PAWSON, R.; TILLY, N. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage, 1997.
PETHERICK, A. “Two sides of transparency: how audits sometimes help, sometimes harm, women’s political representation”. University of Oxford [2018]. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 06/06/2024.
PETTIGREW, A. “Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm”. Journal of Management Studies, vol. 24, 1987.
PETTIGREW, A. “Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice”. Organization Science, vol. 1, n. 3, 1990.
PETTIGREW, A. “What is Processual Analysis”. Scandinavian Journal of Management, vol. 13, n. 4, 1997.
PORTER, M. Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press, 1985.
POWER, M. The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
RAGIN, C. The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.
RIBADU, N. “Battle to Halt Graft Scourge in Africa Ebbs”. New York Times [2009]. Disponível em: . Acesso em 23/05/2024.
ROTHSTEIN, B. The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.
SEABRA, S. Improving the performance of public service organisations: building capabilities to recover and renew (Doctoral Thesis in Administration). Bath: University of Bath, 2010.
SENHORAS, E. M.; FIGUEIRA, P. R. “Cinco Anos de Operação Lava Jato”. Boletim de Conjuntura (BOCA), vol. 1, 2019.
SIMONS, H. Persuasion in Society. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2001.
SZTOMPKA, P. Society in Action: The Theory of Social Becoming. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
TCU - Tribunal de Contas da União. Acórdão 412, de 21 de março de 2007. Brasília: TCU, 2007. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 23/02/2024.
WEAVER, R.; ROCKMAN, B. Do institutions matter? Government capabilities in United States and Abroad. Washington: The Brookings Institution, 1993.
YIN, R. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Los Angeles: Sage, 2017.
ZAMBONI, Y.; LITSCHIG, S. “Audit risk and rent extraction: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Brazil”. Journal of Development Economics, vol. 134, 2018.